top of page
SKIN SIMPLICITY

Knowing the limits is as important as having evidence.

At DERMALU , science is at the heart of the dermatological solutions we create. From the very beginning of design, the criteria for which active ingredient should be based on specific data are determined by dermatologists, chemical engineers, and our clients (stakeholders).

We don't promise unverified results; even if our products have benefits beyond what is claimed, we won't pretend they do if we can't demonstrate it with scientific tests. We develop results-oriented products that don't harm the skin. Simple products should deliver successful results. If a product receives negative feedback from our stakeholders, we will cancel it if there is negative feedback during the testing or initial stages.

Microscopic molecular structures and liquid forms in a laboratory setting.
A representation of a scientific laser beam acting on the skin's surface.
WHAT DO WE ACCEPT AS EVIDENCE?

The evidence varies depending on the claim.

Ürünlerimizde kullandığımız maddelerin literatürde bilinen özelliği, bitmiş ürünün aynı sonucu göstereceğinin tek başına kanıtı değildir.

 

Formülasyon verileri ürünün nasıl tasarlandığını; laboratuvar ve stabilite çalışmaları ürünün bütünlüğünü; güvenlilik değerlendirmeleri tolerabiliteyi; performans testleri ise ilgili ürün iddiasını destekler.

​

​

​

İddia büyüdükçe, gereken kanıt ve kriterler de güçlenir.

PROMISE FROM THE TESTS

We won't make claims without testing.

If we're describing a measurable result, we want to see that result on your skin. We won't finalize the result until the test is complete; if the evaluation is ongoing, we will clearly state this. Your feedback and the health of your skin are as important to us as the results of our tests.

UV protection

SECURITY

TOLERANCE

MAINTENANCE EFFECT

SPF and UVA protection are verified through proper finished product testing.

Microbiological safety, stability, and product safety assessments are separate areas of evidence.

Our products are not suitable for sensitive skin, eye area issues, or comedogenicity.

The strength of barrier, moisture, and comfort claims should be related to the scope of the tests and data used.

​​Dermatolojik tolerans, göz çevresi toleransı ve komedojenite birbirinden farklı değerlendirme alanlarıdır. Bu konularda yalnızca tamamlanmış testlerin desteklediği sonuçları paylaşırız.

Bariyer, nem ve konfor iddalarının gücü kullanılan test ve verinin kapsamı ile ilgili olmalıdır. 

Mikrobiyolojik kalite, stabilite ve ürün güvenlilik değerlendirmesi farklı soruları yanıtlayan ayrı kanıt alanlarıdır.

Frame of chemical molecular structures with blue smoke effect.
TWO COMPLEMENTARY SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE

Doctor's experience

Our dermatologists' clinical experience reflects your expectations; we meet the real-life needs of your patients, ensuring that you and your patients benefit with confidence when you choose us.

This approach forms the basis of our product design and the solutions we offer.

Scientific Data

Scientific data tests observations, measures results, and shows how safe a product we are manufacturing.

At DERMALU, experience and user expectations shape our research. When these two factors come together, we make production decisions.

Soyut bilimsel arka plan üzerinde moleküler yapılar.
APPROACH TO RESOURCES

We don't just find the source.

We choose its purest form.

We evaluate the extent to which a study will translate into our product by considering the active ingredient used, its dosage, the type of formula, the study methodology, and the group studied. We don't just present you with a product because it's a very popular or very good idea. If many criteria come together, it becomes the DERMALU product.
01

Suitability


Is the source truly related to the material we use and the structure of the product?

02

Yöntem
 
Çalışma, soruyu yanıtlayabilecek bir tasarıma sahip mi?

03

Border

Under what conditions and for which user group does this result apply?

04

Transparency

Are the shortcomings and uncertainties of the evidence explained as well as its strength?
bottom of page